May 26, 2008 arend lijphart is best known for his theory of consociational or power sharing democracy, which enables the peaceful governance of deeply divided societies. In this updated and expanded edition of his highly acclaimed book democracies, arend lijphart offers a broader and deeper analysis of worldwide democratic institutions than ever before. The consolidation of the consociational democracy in lebanon. Arend lijphart, consociational democracy, world politics 21 january 1969. Angloamerican political systems exemplified by britain and the united states, continental european political systems france, germany, and italy, and a third category consisting of. Consociational democracy volume 21 issue 2 arend lijphart. In methodical terms, we aim for a higher validity and reliability of the features of democracy as defined by lijphart 1999. The institutional dynamics of consensus and conflict vu research. Arend lijpharts 1999 effort in patterns of democracy may be overstretching, both empirically and theoretically. All content included on our site, such as text, images, digital downloads and other, is the property of its content suppliers and protected by us and international laws. Arend lijphart on sharing power in africa and the future. A deeply divided society with, supposedly, a mainly majoritarian type of democracy, india nevertheless has been able to maintain its democratic system. Ucds role has to be understood in the context of the transition to democracy, not in the context of political accommodation in an ethnoplural society.
Arend lijphart is best known for his theory of consociational or power sharing democracy, which enables the peaceful governance of deeply divided societies. Powersharing and majority rule in theory and practice, london, routledge, 2008. In latelakatosian terms the very duration of the discussion of consociationalism and the. Later, lijphart extends the notion of consociational democracy to the patterns of democratic institutions, in general. These give the electorate a direct vote, which may be binding or advisory, on a specific political, constitutional or legislative issue that is by the initiated people. In the pledge of allegiance we all pledge allegiance to our republic, not to a democracy. Consociational democracy by arend lijphart summary extracts. Forms of direct democracy in this primer, the term direct democracy is used to designate mechanisms that enable the electorate to vote on a specific law, treaty, constitutional amendment, policy or other public decision.
In this updated and expanded edition of his highly acclaimed book democracies, arend lijphart offers a broader and deeper analysis of worldwide democratic. One of the most striking features of the book is the manner in which lijphart divides the book into 10 areas of inquiry e. Consociational parties and political accommodation in. Lijphart is the leading authority on consociationalism, or the ways in which segmented societies manage to sustain democracy through powersharing. Sep 24, 2017 welcome to episode 2 of season 3 of real democracy now. From this perspective, i reassess the relevance of arend lijpharts prescriptions about democratizing states to constitutional engineers, by investigating his claims within the postcommunist context. Consociational democracy as a tool for conflict resolution. While his power sharing model has been widely criticized, it is also being adopted in countries as diverse as the netherlands, india, austria, south. Welcome to episode 2 of season 3 of real democracy now.
Arend dangremond lijphart born 17 august 1936, apeldoorn, netherlands is a political scientist specializing in comparative politics, elections and voting systems, democratic institutions, and ethnicity and politics. Consociational democracy and the case of switzerland. Lijphart starts by differentiating between majoritarian and consensus democracy by asking the question who governs and in whose interest in cases of disagreement. Thus this chapter clarifies the research strategy chosen for this investigation. Patterns of dominance and balance of power 116 8 electoral systems. Yale university press, 1977 political science 248 pages.
Lijpharts democratic quality thesis revisited article pdf available june 2011 with 330 reads how we. Presents a study which investigated the claims of arend lijphart that switzerland is a case of consociational democracy. Comparative politics and the comparative method arend. Consociational democracy as a tool for conflict resolution in. Quade provide opinionated viewpoints for both sides of the argument as well as offer small suggestions of future governing policies for developing countries. Chinese translation simplified characters, beijing, jilin publishing group. While some scholars argue that an electoral system with proportional representation combined with a decentralized system works best, and that the type of electoral system is crucial lijphart 1999, others state that a proportional electoral system with a centralized and hence not decentralized system lead to better performance gerring et al.
Lijphart data codebook this codebook lists brief variable descriptions for the variables in the lijphart. The bestresearched book on democracy in the world today. Lijphart developed this concept in his first major work, the politics of accommodation, a study of the dutch political system, and further developed his arguments in democracy in plural societies. Im laufe seines akademischen lebens erhielt er zahlreiche ehrungen.
Parliamentary versus presidential government free pdf. Arend lijpharts typology of democratic systems has been one of the major contributions to. Lijphart then goes on to define proportionality as being a general principle of consociational democracy that applies not only to the electoral system but also to the composition of the public service and to the allocation of public funds 2000. Examining thirtysix democracies during the halfcentury from 1945 to 1996, lijphart arrives at importantand unexpectedconclusions about what type of democracy works best. For me, it is the ideal system because it is the most capable of maximizing the level of representation given to the widest possible amount of the electorate.
From this perspective, i reassess the relevance of arend lijpharts prescriptions about democratizing states to constitutional engineers, by investigating his claims within the. In this updated and expanded edition of his classic text, arend lijphart offers a broader and deeper analysis of worldwide democratic institutions than ever before. Which is to say, a system of government that enshrines the basic principle that leaders should be elected by those they rule, and that decisions of the governing bodies should be reached by majority vote. The present article reveals that lijpharts two dimensional map of democracy, although applicable. While his power sharing model has been widely criticized, it is also being adopted in countries as diverse as the netherlands, india, austria, south africa, and malaysia.
This requires that they have the ability to transcend cleavages and to join in a common effort with the elites of rival subcultures. Arend lijphart s patterns of democracy has become a standardized text within the comparative politics subfield, but i think the question needs to be asked given all the divergence in regime type that sprouted with the downfall of the soviet union, is the pure westminster system still a viable starting point for analyzing the points of. In patterns of democracy, arend lijphart 1999 not only contends that democratic institutions cluster in two distinct forms, but also that consensus democracieswhen contrasted with. That the elites have the ability to accommodate the divergent interests and demands of the subcultures. Trustees of princeton university political science. Pdf abstract consociational democracy as the goal and a tool in mitigating consociational democracy, arend lijphart, grand coalition, mutual veto, pro. Pdf consociational democracy in theory and practice. It is an indispensable work for all students of democracy and comparative politics, in part because it provides a frank and fascinating portrait of how the concepts. Arend lijphart s patterns of democracy has become a standardized text within the comparative politics subfield, but i think the question needs to be asked given all the divergence in regime type that sprouted with the downfall of the soviet union, is the pure westminster system still a viable starting point for analyzing the points of democratic governance. The article pays tribute to professor arend lijphart, pioneer in the studies of democracy. Introduction my ideal of democracy aligns closely to lijpharts model of consensus democracy, which i will be discussing at length in this essay. He followed up with further studies of political stability in cases of socially severely fragmented societies, eventually leading to his groundbreaking work democracy in plural societies lijphart 1977. Consociational democracy can be found in countries that are deeply divided into in particular by arend lijphart, and is used today as both an analytical and a. Nov 17, 2008 in patterns of democracy, arend lijphart 1999 not only contends that democratic institutions cluster in two distinct forms, but also that consensus democracieswhen contrasted with majoritarian arrangementsare kinder, gentler types of institutional settings lijphart 1999.
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the united states of america, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. This revision of lijpharts classic democracies is a firstrate survey of 36 democracies, which focuses on the relationships between a number of political variables. Arend lijpharts most popular book is patterns of democracy. Consociational democracy world politics cambridge core. Arend lijphart has 28 books on goodreads with 1762 ratings. He received his phd in political science at yale university in 1963, after studying at principia college from 1955 to 1958. He argues that the instability inherent in a consociational democracy is counteracted by the coalescent behavior of leaders of different segments lijphart 1977. Powersharing and majority rule in theory and practice, london. Thus this chapter clarifies the research strategy chosen for. In patterns of democracy, arend lijphart 1999 not only contends that democratic institutions cluster in two distinct forms, but also that consensus democracieswhen contrasted with majoritarian arrangementsare kinder, gentler types of institutional settings lijphart 1999. The author is indebted to the institute of international studies, berkeley, for financial support.
Arend lijpharts patterns of democracy has become a standardized text within the comparative politics subfield, but i think the question needs to be asked given all the divergence in regime type that sprouted with the downfall of the soviet union, is the pure westminster system still a viable starting point for analyzing the points of. They precede the decisions of governing institutions, and in some jurisdictions. Arend lijphart university of california, san diego i ndia has been the one major deviant case for consociational powersharing theory, and its sheer size makes the exception especially damaging. Arend lijphart is professor emeritus of political science at the university of california, san diego, and the author or editor of more than twenty books, including democracy in plural societies, published by yale university press. Dans patterns of democracy government forms and performance in thirtysix countries, paru.
Books by arend lijphart author of patterns of democracy. Theoretical, conceptual and methodological problems in. Concentration versus sharing of executive power 90 7 executivelegislative relations. While it may be difficult to achieve and maintain stable democratic governments in countries with deep religious, ideological, linguistic, cultural, or ethnic cleavages, lijphart argues that it is not at all impossible. Arend lijphart is known for his works on comparative methods,1 electoral systems,2 and nonmajoritarian or powersharing democracy. Arend lijpharts patterns of democracy has become a standardized text within the comparative politics subfield, but i think the question needs to be asked given all the divergence in regime type that sprouted with the downfall of the soviet union, is the pure westminster system still a viable starting point for analyzing the points of democratic governance. Government forms and performance in thirtysix countries new haven. Evaluation of lijpharts model of consensus democracy the.
Pdf examining the favourable factors for consociational. For plural societies, he suggested ethnicbased consociationalism as a form of governance defined as a. Parliamentary versus presidential government by arend lijphart editor in djvu, epub, txt download ebook. Examining thirtysix democracies during the period from 1945 to 2010, lijphart arrives at importantand unexpectedconclusions about what type of democracy works best. Almonds famous typology of political systems, first expounded in 1956, he distinguishes three types of western democratic systems.
Political scientists define a consociational state as one which has major internal divisions along ethnic, religious, or linguistic lines, with none of the divisions large enough to form a majority group, but which remains stable due to. Pdf the analysis of favourable factors for establishment and maintenance of consociational democracy is important to assess the. The phenomenon lijphart was describing, however, was not new. Is proportional representation best, and if so, what type. The challenges to democracy in lebanon by micheline germanos ghattas a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy in public affairs and policy disseratation committee. Evaluation of lijpharts model of consensus democracy. The consolidation of the consociational democracy in. Lijphart, who developed and advocated the consociational theory, has recognized certain. Earlier research hadnt agreed on one definition of the quality of democracy see e.
Season 3 is looking at elections, electoral systems, electoral reform and alternatives. Arend lijphart page absoliutnogo i otnositelnogo bolshinstva versus proporsionalnoe predstavitelstvo, oikoumene kharkov, ukraine, vol. The limitations of the consociational arrangements in iraq. The aim is to understand whether there is a democratic solution to the conflict through power sharing democracy.
523 440 482 738 843 523 1143 498 293 1349 1241 89 41 181 1198 997 979 1090 463 827 364 114 760 417 206 223 1035 1315 1208 174 1343 1169 991 484 380 516 1445 681 113 597 1207 899